animer les proccessus de décision : du jazz !

Je retombe sur ce newsletter, après quelques années, qui me semble toujours aussi inspirant. Quand les questions qu’on se pose sont de cet ordre : comment mieux définir les relations entre conseil d’administration et directions…

  • Listen & Learn. Jazz musicians are constantly listening to and learning from each other.
  • Engage & Encourage. Those organizations that take the time to discover, develop, and encourage what people can do best and enjoy doing most are going to be the organizations that attract and retain the best people.
  • Appreciate & Align. The oil of accomplishment, in both jazz and nonprofit governance, is appreciation. Discovering what’s going right and building on thestrengths and talents that are making it happen is a far more powerful approach to organizational effectiveness that getting stuck in cyclesof criticism and complaint about what’s going wrong.
  • Do & Delight. Passion, talent, engagement, and alignment mean nothing unless something happens. Doing it right brings delight. And if it isn’t fun, it isn’t jazz. (extrait de CharityChannel’s Nonprofit Boards and Governance Review eNewsletter)

Quelques autres articles qui me semblent intéressants :

Et aussi le site de Carver, sur la gouvernance (des OBNL, entre autres), propose une définition de la « gouvernance par politiques » adaptée aux OBNL (Policy Governance for Non-Profit Organizations).

Qu'en pensez vous ?